NOTE BETWEEN PRINTED EDITIONS
The True Impact of Extreme Infringements on Our 2nd Amendment Rights
A Conservative Black Man’s Perspective from the Heart of Boston
By Nolan Howard
Special to Boston Broadside
As a concerned black firearm owner operating a business in Boston, I find myself compelled to address the recent passage of bill H4885, a piece of legislation that, while may have been designed with good intentions, completely overlooks the intricacies and necessities of urban communities, particularly those of color. This act serves as a stark reminder of the disconnect between state representatives and the unique challenges faced by cities like ours.
The essence of my concern lies in the oversimplification and generalized assumptions upon which this bill was founded. It seems that those who have the power to shape our lives are making pivotal decisions from a distance, without stepping foot into the diverse neighborhoods they aim to regulate. The narrative of urban realities cannot and should not be scripted from the quiet of an office but requires engagement and understanding of the streets and stories that make up our communities.
Moreover, H4885 introduces stringent regulations and requirements that, frankly, threaten the survival of local businesses like mine. The wide-reaching implications of this bill do not just tighten control but could potentially dismantle an ecosystem of urban firearm ownership that has been responsible and safe, owing to stringent self-regulation and education.
Speaking of education, an area of particular frustration is the bill’s glaring overlook towards the potential for positive gun education programs, especially for our youth. Initiatives such as hunting programs and firearm safety courses can serve as invaluable tools for mentorship, responsibility, and conservation education. Yet, by neglecting this aspect, the legislators not only miss out on a chance to foster respect and understanding around firearms but also alienate a significant portion of the community for whom hunting and shooting sports are a cultural linchpin.
Since it has come to light that the governor has recently signed an emergency preamble in Massachusetts that poses a threat to FFLs, gun clubs, and small businesses. This decision has sparked worry and dismay among many community members, as it may have severe repercussions for the firearms industry in the state.
Furthermore, the requirement to sign a form at Cabela’s in order to purchase ammunition has been criticized as baffling and bureaucratic. Such unnecessary obstacles may hinder individuals from exercising their rights and accessing essential supplies.
It is crucial for stakeholders and citizens to stay informed and engaged in discussions regarding these developments to ensure that sensible and fair policies are upheld.
As we stand at this crossroads, I implore our state representatives to take a step back and reconsider the broader impacts of H4885. Legislation in the vacuum of experience only serves to widen the gap between policymakers and the people they serve. It’s time for our voices to be heard, for the nuances of our lives to be acknowledged, and for a more inclusive dialogue to shape our common future.
Sign the petition and stay informed through The Civil Rights Coalition.
Send Maura Healey a lawful notice through WethePeople.us
#H4885 #UrbanGunOwnership #Boston #FirearmEducation #CommunityVoices
Nolan Howard
President of NAAGA MASSACHUSETTS
617 Defense LLC
(508)-740-7981
“Let’s change the Notion on 2A in Boston”
Click for related Boston Broadside article.
Letter sent to Colonel John Mawn explaining how this new law would put my business in jeopardy being a black firearm instructor.
Dear Col. John Mawn,
I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to you regarding the forthcoming firearms safety curriculum changes and their implications, especially concerning the communities across Massachusetts that may not have access to the same resources as others.
While it is understood that these modifications aim to enhance public safety and ensure responsible firearm ownership, the potential impact these changes may have on specific demographics, particularly our black and brown communities, requires careful consideration. The introduction of the new firearms safety curriculum, including advanced components such as injury prevention, suicide prevention, disengagement tactics, and live fire exercises, coupled with the requirement for completion of a written examination, mark a significant shift in the state’s approach to firearm safety training.
It is commendable that the curriculum is expanding to address crucial safety concerns directly. However, the accessibility of these new training requirements for everyone involved, particularly those in urban communities with limited resources, stands as an urgent concern. While the decision to grandfather licenses issued on or before August 1, 2024, seems fair for current license holders, the new requisites for new applicants may inadvertently erect barriers to responsible firearm ownership among law-abiding citizens in the less privileged communities.
The need for disengagement training and live fire exercises can potentially introduce financial and logistical challenges that disproportionately affect our black and brown citizens. These communities often face systemic disparities in access to training facilities and resources, potentially impeding their constitutional right to own firearms for self-defense and other legal purposes.
I urge you to reconsider or re-evaluate the implementation process of the new training curriculum. It is crucial to develop a comprehensive strategy that includes provisions to ensure equal access to training and education for all Massachusetts residents, irrespective of their socioeconomic status or geographic location. Considering partnerships with community organizations and offering subsidies or mobile training units could be steps in the right direction. Additionally, creating a public awareness campaign that underscores the importance of the new training components while emphasizing support mechanisms for those who might find them challenging to meet could go a long way towards fostering a culture of responsible and inclusive firearm ownership. Massachusetts has always been a leader in advocating for the safety and well-being of its citizens.
As such, this present pivotal moment offers an opportunity to set a benchmark for comprehensive, accessible, and equitable firearm safety training that serves the interests of all state residents. By undertaking adjustments that acknowledge and bridge the resource gap, we can ensure that the new curriculum not only enhances public safety but also upholds the rights and dignity of every Massachusetts citizen. Thank you for considering my appeal. I trust in your leadership and judgment to guide towards a resolution that best serves the diverse needs of our communities while continuing to prioritize their safety and security.
Sincerely,
Anthony N. Howard
